To the contrary, the Court has linked it for decades to other settled freedoms involving bodily integrity, familial relationships, and procreation. "No one should be confident that this majority is done with its work," they wrote. In fact, the justices who disagreed with the majority opinion echoed this idea in their dissent. Now, experts say there is good reason to be concerned about what the decision will mean for access to all kinds of reproductive health care in the near future. But he also writes that "in future cases," the court "should reconsider" the decisions in the cases that established those rights. In Justice Clarence Thomas' concurring opinion, he writes that other cases that protect the right to contraception, to same-sex marriage and to engage in private, consensual sex acts "are not at issue" in this particular decision.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |